OT..The: \"What WERE they thinking?\" Syndrome
/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shocked.gif Posting about the GM cars using ball bearings on front spindles got me to thinking about so much stuff that has been foisted on the machinery-buying public that you just HAVE to wonder: "What WERE they thinking?" 'They' in most cases being the designers. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif I've done time: "on the drawing board" of a major equipment manufacturer, so I KNOW how unimaginative and how naive some engineers can be when it comes to designing individual parts. Just recently I redesigned and built a part for a Case-International Model 2366 combine, a part that as previously designed had broken three times in less than 500 hours. When you look at how it was designed, you just have to wonder how anyone could go to engineering skool and design something that bad; something with NO CHANCE of surviving once the machine rolled out of product test and onto a flatcar. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/mad.gif Putting ball bearings on the front spindles of the heavy cars from the fifties.....like Buicks for example....guaranteed that they would have front wheel bearing "issues". The guys who raced those cars used what we used to call Ray-Ceez (Races) which were a timken bearing equipped spindle with a hollow core that slipped over the Buick spindle and was held in place by the Buick castle nut. If not for that, you could count on a Buick going out after about fifty laps...tops. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif
/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shocked.gif Posting about the GM cars using ball bearings on front spindles got me to thinking about so much stuff that has been foisted on the machinery-buying public that you just HAVE to wonder: "What WERE they thinking?" 'They' in most cases being the designers. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif I've done time: "on the drawing board" of a major equipment manufacturer, so I KNOW how unimaginative and how naive some engineers can be when it comes to designing individual parts. Just recently I redesigned and built a part for a Case-International Model 2366 combine, a part that as previously designed had broken three times in less than 500 hours. When you look at how it was designed, you just have to wonder how anyone could go to engineering skool and design something that bad; something with NO CHANCE of surviving once the machine rolled out of product test and onto a flatcar. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/mad.gif Putting ball bearings on the front spindles of the heavy cars from the fifties.....like Buicks for example....guaranteed that they would have front wheel bearing "issues". The guys who raced those cars used what we used to call Ray-Ceez (Races) which were a timken bearing equipped spindle with a hollow core that slipped over the Buick spindle and was held in place by the Buick castle nut. If not for that, you could count on a Buick going out after about fifty laps...tops. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif