i didnt mean "it wouldnt work" as in it is impossible to do.. i meant that it wouldnt work usefully.
and notice that i did say "there are ways to do it, but it looks like total crap" adapters like the one you mention are exactly waht i was refering to. they have been around for years, but have never been any good.
I have worn alot of hats in my day, but my 2 true loves have been and will always be jeeps and computers.
I am the head computer technician at a reputable college, i also teach computer grpahics at the college. I have 2 years of college in programming.
and hold a bachelors degree in Computer Graphics. I have studied digital video, converting standard video to digital and visa versa, compositing, and output media. In other words alot of my training is specificly related to the bridge between TV and computer. so needless to say i DO know alot about computers and an aweful lot about this particular subject.
I do not want to get into a "i know more than you" kinda thing. because i very well may not in many cases.
but there are a few things i do know.
1. tv runs at approximately 640x480 in computer terms.
2. most modern computers run closer to 1024x768 comfortably.
3. modern releases of software will disable 640x480 mode because it is not suggested anymore.
4. comparing a tv to a monitor would be like comparing a geo tracker to a HUMVEE. TV's dont even have actual quality ratings since they are so low quality. but in monitor terms a cheapy monitor can have a rating of 28. (lower is better) with 24 and 21 being great quality. lately companies have released very high quality TV's that can be used as a monitor as well. remember, only the very best TV's can also double as a monitor. but guess what rating those are? well where real monitors range from 19(amazing)-28(garbage) these TV/monitors they sell now typically rate as a 50+ on the monitors scale (known as dot pitch for the computer savy) basically. i am just trying to say that even the BEST tv made is garbage compared to a cheap monitor.
so my point being that no matter how good of an adapter they make to use a TV instead of a monitor, it will never work well. you will have to force the computer to run in 640x480 (very lo-res mode) and cramping that onto a cheapy playstation 2 monitor cant be of very good quality.
(many laptops these days come with a TV output, so you can use a TV as your monitor. and to me it still looks aweful.
running a computer thru a TV is like off roading a hummer with slicks. doesnt matter how good the rims are, or what kind of lockers you have. if the final link is not a good one, all the rest of the components are meaningless.
DISCLAIMER: this is all theory, and i can be proven wrong at any time. i have never personally tried any of the above mentioned combos.so maybe a playstaion lcd screen would look great on a laptop, but in my OPINION (based on theory) it is not worth it.
to get an idea what this would be like...
turn your computers resolution down to 640x480 (if you computer will even alow you to do this) that is what you will need to have it at for the play station or other such thing.
then stand about 10 feet from the monitor which is about what it will look like on a 5" screen.
and then cover your face with a piece of clear plastic wrap, this will give you about the amount of blur the converter and tv parts will make.
if after all this, you think it looks fine and workable, then this might be the way to go.
but my vote is to stay with all parts designed for a computer.
if you have alot of money to spare, and want the solution to all your problems, just buy a tablet PC. it is basically just a flat screen LCD monitor. but it is a full computer inside. and it is fully touch screen, so you dont need keyboard or mouse. just slap that baby overhead and you are ready to go. (and it will only cost you about $3000)