[ QUOTE ]
How would you feel, what would you teach your kids, if some great powers took your land, took your posessions, kicked you out of your homes, then placed people there that they themselves didn't want?
[/ QUOTE ]
this is what i've gather from books and online....if im mistaken no anything....let me know /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif
in the mid/late 1800s the jews started buying land from the ottoman and private arab land holders.....often paying $1000's (thousands) an acre....this was at the same time that prime-awesome land in the US was going for $100ish per acre.
the jews irrigated otherwise barren land, build hospitals and took a dead area and made it alive. the hospitals were not "jewish only" and lead to a HUGE decrease in the infant mortality rate for arabs in those regions.
once the arabs realized the jews had a good thing going they got cranky and started freaking out....which is the start of what we have today....the arab population was pissed off well before the establishment of the jewish state. the jewish state was formed BECAUSE of the fact that arabs and jews seemed unable to resolve thier differences (and from my perspective it seems as though the arabs were the ones causing the problems first...but thats perspective im sure)
i dont think i would draw parallels to native americans. native americans were pretty ignorant of western culture...didnt understand land ownership, etc.....we horn-swagled them pretty good....and i dont think that was right....
but the arabs in that region did understand land ownership....and they sold thier land fair and square....for one HECK OF A GOOD PRICE. there was no eminant domain...no hostile take over.....just money.
so im hardly sympathetic to the arab cause.
the way i see it is this:
1) if israel disarmed, it would only be a matter of time before it was destroyed by muslims groups...gone...pretty much everyone dead. there would be no peace for jewish people, even if the state of israel was gone. they would relocate out of the middle east, or die.
2) if those muslims groups suddenly disarmed.....israel would no longer pursue or bomb them, they could lead normal lives. i firmly believe that this conflict is MOSTLY (stress mostly, because israel isnt innocent in all ways either) the fault of muslim groups....if they laid off.....the conflicts as we know them would be over.
hence why i lean towards the disarming of the muslim groups......i suppose we can argue by what means that should be done....but i think its clear who the "bad guys" are in the conflict.
my 0.02$ /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif