In reply to:
I've read good things about the 2.8 V6 Ford swap
[/ QUOTE ]
The Ford 2.9 is a very stout motor IMO, I've had many friends with bronco 2's and rangers and they seem to hold up very well.
In reply to:
Has anyone done it with a 4sp auto?
[/ QUOTE ]
Not sure, the only trannies that are running of my head are the 4L60Es etc.. and those are computer controlled...
In reply to:
I was thinking of a carbed V6, as this would be easiest swap in.
[/ QUOTE ]
I can respect that, I ditched a TBI setup on my current motor to run carb, but dont understand why you would be willing to wire in a tranny, but not a motor..remmember the KISS method. A well tuned 2.9 carbed motor with a C4 planted behind it would be a good power upgrade for a samurai, and a well tuned carb will perform just fine if you ask me. One thing to consider is what I mistakenly had to learn, every ford transfer case is driver side output, so unless you decide to use the stock setup ( might not be a good idea), you mine as well start studying advanced adaptors catalog.
In reply to:
I can see the problem with tranny length in a SWB, but is should be okay in a LWB, yes?
[/ QUOTE ]
Surely, you have around 13 more inches (I believe) to work with, the more the merrier.
In reply to:
What kind of cruise rpm on the highway are you guys running with the 2.8/C4 setup? MPG?
[/ QUOTE ]
Ok not to be rude, but I've done many swaps into zuks, and one thing I've came to notice that it takes a good investment and bone solid install to make a swap truck a good street truck, big bird is still not something to just jump into and ride up to the quickie mart for groceries. One thing to remmember about a swap is that your always gonna have bugs to work out afterwards, sometimes more sometimes less, so if your basing this truck around a daily driver, beware. As far as MPG's, block that out, depending on tire size gearing etc...your not gonna like that, but thats no reason to resist a swap. RPMs? again matters on tire size and gearing.