Getting the most out of a '98 500 RMK - Off-Road Forums & Discussion Groups
Snowmobile Lounge All general discussions relating to Snowmobiles

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of (permalink) Old 03-03-2000, 12:14 PM
**DONOTDELETE**
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Getting the most out of a \'98 500 RMK

I bought a '98 500 RMK last year and have been regretting it ever since. The handling and ride are great but the engine and
performance!!!! I know these are designed as mountain sleds and I am from the prairies(elev. ~1600') but I really thought it could be
set up to run around here. Stock it comes with smaller(34mm) carbs and lower gearing. Is it possible or is there any advantage
to putting 38mm carbs on it like the regular 500's. What about clutching or perhaps a slightly larger gear?? Basically the standard
500 Indy blows away my 500 RMK. Maybe my best option is to sell the RMK. Any thoughts/suggestions?? Thanks.

Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of (permalink) Old 03-03-2000, 11:21 PM
**DONOTDELETE**
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Getting the most out of a \'98 500 RMK

I can almost say for certain that your jetting is too rich and your clutch is set up wrong for your elevation. We run into this problem all
the time in Alaska because we also ride at fairly low elevation. Set up your RMK as a comperable Indy 500 and things will be better.
You still won't be running with the short-trackers because of the significant more amount of rolling resistance due to your paddle
track. Buy your self a Heelclicker clutch set-up and change your jetting and you'll be running with them with ease.

If you can't buy what you want, BUILD IT!!
post #3 of (permalink) Old 03-05-2000, 11:35 AM
**DONOTDELETE**
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Getting the most out of a \'98 500 RMK

Thanks for the input Frankenstein, you're help is appreciated. I'm pretty sure the jets could be one or two sizes smaller.
The clutching is something that I'll probably get some help with, but I know it could be better. You're right about a long track with
the same engine size not being able to keep up with a short track, but this RMK is severly lacking 'snap'.

Thanks again for the info.

Duke

Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Off-Road Forums & Discussion Groups forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome