435 / T 18 - Off-Road Forums & Discussion Groups
Jeep-Short Wheelbase All discussion of short wheelbase Jeeps: CJ, TJ, YJ and JK

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of (permalink) Old 01-08-2001, 03:32 AM
**DONOTDELETE**
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
435 / T 18

anyone know which of these trannys is stronger / better overall / drawbacks? i have both a 1982-ford 435 and a 1985-ford T18

the T18 has some minor chipping on all the teeth of the leading edge/nose of the 1st gear, gear. will this hurt the thing?

Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of (permalink) Old 01-08-2001, 07:53 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 611
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
Re: 435 / T 18

I researched this subject a lot when I swapped trannies; it came down to those two for me; the only negative thing I heard in talking to many people was that the NP 435 could have problems popping out of first gear when in low range for an extended period of time. The guys around here who build those trannies for a Jeep do a slight internal modification to get around that problem. The grannies are fairly close, I think 435 is 6.59 and T-18 is 6.32. The only other difference was 435 has an aluminum shift cover plate, T-18 is cast.

I love my T-18; it's the only thing saving my crawl ratio right now.

Max

82 CJ, some stuff stock, some stuff not
Have you hugged your Jeep today?
http://members.fortunecity.com/patrol14/index.html; might be looking for a new one after Thursday
CJ money pit is offline  
post #3 of (permalink) Old 01-08-2001, 08:13 AM
**DONOTDELETE**
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: 435 / T 18

both are good trannys and the np435's are prone to walking out of first gear when in low range. it is an easy fix though. the t-18 has a 6.32to1 first gear and the np435's is 6.69to1.

brian wilson
80 cj5 "high 5"
stretched to 100" wb
efi351w/np435/d300/d44/d60/detroits/4.56/35tsl's/
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of (permalink) Old 01-08-2001, 03:16 PM
**DONOTDELETE**
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: 435 / T 18

The problem with NP435's walking out of gear can be attributed to the input shaft provided by Advance when adapting it to Jeeps. They have finally admitted that machining tolerances weren't tight enough on many of their input shafts and is causing the problem. If you do have this problem they won't just take your word that their shaft is the problem though. They make you pull it out and send it to them for measurement. I haven't heard of anybody's claim being denied though.

'75 CJ5,258 w/Howell EFI,T18a,4.27's,33's,On-board air,Warn 8274
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Off-Road Forums & Discussion Groups forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome