worth? - Off-Road Forums & Discussion Groups
Ford 67-96 F-Series, 78-96 Bronco All discussions of 67-96 F-Series Trucks and 78-96 Broncos

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of (permalink) Old 02-12-2001, 12:02 AM
**DONOTDELETE**
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
worth?

Auto Trader:
1979 Ford Bronco, 351M, 4 barrell, automatic trans, and a 6" lift and 3" body lift with bald 44 tires and new 513 axle gears warren bumper and winch 6000 pounds also have rear trailer hitch winch good trail ride $5500 FIRM
no way it is worth that right?
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of (permalink) Old 02-12-2001, 08:14 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 920
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
Re: worth?

The winch and the bumpers probably cost $3000 sound good but I would do a good check and test drive it while it's cold and hot. I got taken once.

Backyard Builder-If I ain't drivin it I'm under it!
slickerthanyou is offline  
post #3 of (permalink) Old 02-12-2001, 04:15 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,147
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
Re: worth?

A 351M sucks gas(if you'll pardon the expression) like an old Ford. It may very well have been the engine that the phrase was coined after. 5.13 gears ain't gonna help things either. A 351 has all of the weight of a 460 and none of the cubes.

Another thing to remember is the chasis is 23 model years old. Now granted this truck seems to have everything you want for some REALLY serious field work, you'd want to make sure you had a real need for a monster like that and that you didn't drive this too far on the road as it's gonna eat you outta house and home.

Still, someone bled their guts (and wallet) out building it and if it's in reasonable shape and you really can use something like that, offer him 3 grand.

My call

Malcolm

Sixlitre is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of (permalink) Old 02-12-2001, 05:22 PM
**DONOTDELETE**
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: worth?

The drivetrain on that puppy is unbeatable as far as stock equipment goes (excpt the engine). The color is ugly as sh!t, though, and the body style is somewhat dated. If you were to use this as a hunting truck and for some muddy trails, than by all means buy it. But I hope that yer not going to expect to daily drive it. Considering the age, bodystyle, and realistic application, I don't see it being worth much more than 3500. That's what I would offer the guy.
-mike

post #5 of (permalink) Old 02-12-2001, 11:15 PM
**DONOTDELETE**
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: worth?

Problem is, this dude owned his own tree cutting business. He has 2 ton dump trucks, tree trimmers, and they are huge. But what blows my mind is this Bronco is atleast 2 feet taller than all of them.
I think a 460 would be more appropriate but I want atleast 12-13mpg is this possible



[img]/wwwthreads_images/icons/cool.gif[/img] <font color=blue>1980 Chevy Scottsdale - 396 - TH350 - NP205 - Dana 60/Corp 14 combo - 40" TSL's - 4 different colors - pics real soon </font color=blue> [img]/wwwthreads_images/icons/cool.gif[/img]
post #6 of (permalink) Old 02-12-2001, 11:21 PM
Mud in my Veins
 
muddybronco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: woooooo pig sooooooie!
Posts: 6,842
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
Re: worth?

I doubt it. 10 mpg would probably be the best you could expect. trucks that high have no aerodynamics, and without an overdrive trans highway driving will, as mentioned earlier, suck gas. but if you could afford it as a second vehicle it would be awesome with a 460!

It's a Jeep thing? My Bronco thing will run over your little Jeep thing.

Muddybronco
muddybronco is offline  
post #7 of (permalink) Old 02-15-2001, 08:08 PM
**DONOTDELETE**
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: worth?

Accually whoever said 351M sucks gas? refering to the engine sucking or its gas sucking abilities? Really its a pretty efficient engine - it breaths better than a windsor thanks to its Clevland heritage, although it is a 79 so that might hurt you some - with the emmision stuff. But I have a '78 with 36s that'll pass emmisions and it gets 13.5mpg. Most people stick a massive carb on there looking for more power - These are trucks people CFM helps at 4-5K how often do you rev you're truck like that. 450CFM would probably do it for most people - just as much torque better throttle response and mileage. But the motor does kind of suck - except for the Big block bellhousing bolt pattern. It has a pretty bad oiling setup (It oils lifters first, Mains and rods tend to get starved in old loose motors) but it can be pretty well shored up by taking a oil line from the rear of the motor, the galley that they stick the pressure sensor on, up to the front by the filter where a sending unit would go on a Windsor. Otherwise the motor is built like a brute. But you may want to consider a 390 or somthing it'll bolt up to you're transmission as well, 460 might be a little over the top esspecially if you want to use it for trail use. The truck sounds well equiped if the work is done well it could be worth 5500, If you really need somthing like that - or you could get a pretty stout preformer set up for alot less if you do it you're self. my 2 cents.

'78 Custom 4"Lift 36"HummV tires Factory Rollbar-QuadShock-4Speed. '78XLT A/C, Cruise. '83Custom A/C and sweet paintjob.
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Off-Road Forums & Discussion Groups forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome