Thank you for the responses, I have been banging my head against the brake issue for sometime. I should have asked for help long ago.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sourpwr I have run the explorer rear calipers with drum E-brakes in the rear with stock CJ7 calipers up front. The pair was well balanced, but the e-brake sucked. It worked until after the first trip out. Then I could never get the Ebrake to hold the Jeep in my driveway. But the brakes were pretty well balanced front to rear with the stock master and prop valve. |
I am glad to hear that that system was well balanced, that is why I fear running the 77 Caddy calipers in the rear. According to the Napa web page the caddy calipers are 2.5" diameter and open far enough to use with Chevy front rotors (1.285" thick). The Explorer or Cherokee Calipers are 1.81" and 1.88" respectively. Since the jeep is much closer in size and weight distribution to these vehicles, I figure they will lead a closer balance. The problem is they only open enough to fit a 0.473" and 0.43" thick rotor. And I had not such luck in finding such a rotor in the correct diameter and lug pattern.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BMB The second version I like much better.
I used 91 Chevy K1500 front rotors and 88 Lincoln MVII rear calipers. The rotors slipped right on with no mods and the calipers fit with no problems. I've had them on for a couple of years and they still hold quite well. For the brake cables I ordered some for an 85 Mustang SVO and hooked them to a parking brake lever from a Nissan ? mounted on my tranny tunnel cover. |
The other common calipers are for the 79 to 85 Caddy. These were designed to only open to fit a 1.035" thick rotor as were the Lincoln Mark VII calipers (both 2.12" diameter piston). The thiner front discs from a Later CJ are this thick(the ones with the caliper mount bolted to the knuckle with 2 bolts) but they are 5 lug which did not help me.
The 91 Chevy K1500 is perfect. 1.035" thick and 6 lug, I should note there are 2 rotors for this year the "Heavy Duty" model is to thick (1.285") while the regular is correct for my use (1.035"). It never occurred to me to check these this solves a big problem.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rio_Grande My F250 disks hold really well.
As for trail rigs I have seen several that seemed to hold well. |
That is good to hear I will want a very good parking brake as I will be installing a Hydraulic winch and will need the holding power.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mbalbritton Not sure what other vehicles offer this, but the ZJ with Disc Brakes has an internal drum brake style Parking brake. I've HEARD of people adapting those to other axles. May be worth looking into. |
I though about the drum type brakes but do not want to go that route. I have never had good luck with parking brakes holding and a very small drum in the center of the rotors seems like it would work even less well.
Again thanks for the help. These will go on my home brew Full float HD AMC20 so I know I will have to do a lot of custom fitting. I was actually about to give up, and go back to drums
